nowbotstorm

1. Beats Studio 3 Vs Solo 3
2. Studio Or Solo Beats
3. Beats Studio 3 Wireless Headphones

Original Beats Solo vs. Studio comparison! Beats Solo 2 vs. Before we get into the Beats Solo 3 vs. Studio comparison, grab a snack, sit back and relax because. You’ve come to the right place!! What I will bring you in this review. Today I will simply give my impressions of both the Beats Solo and Studio, with some Similarities. Amazon.com: beats solo vs studio. Skip to main content. Zee's Music 443353 Matte Zipper Earphones Carrying Case for Beats Monster by Dr. Dre Studio, Studio Wireless, Studio 2.0, Solo Wireless, Solo, Solo HD Over-Ear Headphone Replacement Case Pouch Bag Box. 4.3 out of 5 stars 29.

Apple/Beats recently updated the Solo3 headphones with new features on par with the Apple AirPods. That specifically includes the company’s own W1 chip which offers significant performance and connectivity benefits over the Solo2. At $299.95, they’re still a bit overpriced though clearly a step ahead in the right direction.

The most expensive Beats headphones, the Studio Wireless, have not received an update and don’t look to get one any time. At $379.95, they’re no easy purchase. So if Solo3 is newer, does that make the pair of headphones better than the older yet more expensive Studio Wireless? Let’s compare the two to find out.

Here’s a good deal on the Beats Solo3 Wireless On-Ear Headphones on Amazon. And check out the refurbished Beats Studio headphone as well.

The Solo3 W1 Chip

The Solo3 right away offers significant advantages over the Studio Wireless thanks to the new Apple W1 chip. It’s the same chip Apple boasts about in the AirPods as well as the BeatsX earbuds and PowerBeats. The chip delivers unparalleled battery life to the wireless headphones plus easy pairing with Apple devices.

The Solo3 gets 40 hours of playback before needing a recharge, which is pretty close to unheard of in the industry. The older Studio Wireless sans W1 only gets a sad 12 hours. There’s no comparison here.

Studio Wireless also has to pair using traditional Bluetooth methods. Press the pairing button, wait for activation, then go to the Bluetooth settings on your device, find your Beats and hope for success.

Meanwhile, as soon as you hold your Solo3 headphones up to an Apple device, the device asks you to connect. Boom, you’re all done. As an added bonus, this connection heads up into iCloud so your other devices can automatically connect to the Solo3 too.

On-Ear vs. Over-Ear

If comfort is a high priority, you’re more likely to see success with an over-ear pair such as Studio Wireless.

If you’re already leaning towards the Solo3 headphones, you might need to make one major sacrifice: comfort. The Beats Solo3 are on-ear headphones while the Beats Studio Wireless are over-ear. The Solo3 cups rest against your ears while the Studio Wireless are big enough to wrap entirely around them.

Over-ear headphones are generally more comfortable for extended usage because they don’t put pressure on the ear. As an added benefit, the enclosure of over-ear headphones is better at filtering out unwanted noise.

Many on-ear headphones are comfortable enough though. In fact, most reviewers didn’t have any particularly negative comments about the Solo3’s comfort. While it usually comes down to personal preference, if comfort is a high priority, you’re more likely to see success with an over-ear pair such as Studio Wireless.

Check out the classy BeatsX earbuds on Amazon if you haven’t already.

Sound Quality

Beats headphones have always had a reputation for subpar sound quality. It’s not that they ever sounded bad per se, but they definitely sounded bad for the price.

Sound was way off balance and gave preference to a large boomy bass over decent mids or highs. That’s great for genres like hip hop, but falls short of adequate for classical, rock or even pop.

However, reviews of the Solo3 are pretty universally positive. It seems like with Apple in larger control since the acquisition, the company is pushing for more balanced sound to target a wider audience. Generally, you shouldn’t be too worried about sound quality if you go with the Solo3 headphones.

The Studio Wireless headphones haven’t been updated since 2014, but never suffered as much from the sound quality issue compared to other Beats headphones.

They’re heavy on the bass too, but are more in line with the Solo3 than Solo2. They also include noise cancelling too. That said, Studio Wireless are still $80 more and one of the more expensive wireless headphones on the market.

Verdict

I’m shocked to say this, but it does look like as of now Solo3 headphones are superior to the Studio Wireless. Since sound quality isn’t really an issue for either — both are fairly balanced and clear with minimal distortion — Solo3 wins solely on features. The battery life is stellar as is easy connectivity to Apple devices.

Hopefully, Studio Wireless gets some W1 love in 2017.

The only reason why you might prefer Studio Wireless (and I certainly would as a big over-ear fan) is comfort level. Don’t get Solo3 if you don’t like headphones that rest directly on your ears.

But even then, you’re probably just better off waiting for Studio Wireless to get a refresh. Shelling out $380 on a pair of outdated headphones doesn’t sound worth it.

Hopefully, Studio Wireless gets some W1 love in 2017. Until then, Solo3 is your best bet.

Also Read: How to Optimize Your Listening Experience on Earphones/HeadphonesAlso See#accessories #audio

Did You Know

Brian Eno composed the old and popular Microsoft Sound.

More in Gadgets

6 Best Clear and Transparent Cases for the Google Pixel 3a That You Can Buy

Hey there friend and Welcome aboard!!

• Original Beats Solo vs. Studio comparison!

Before we get into the Beats Solo 3 vs. Studio comparison, grab a snack, sit back and relax because..

What I will bring you in this review

Today I will simply give my impressions of both the Beats Solo and Studio, with some Similarities & Differences outlined. 🙂

1. Introduction
2. Similarities & Differences
3. Final Word

Now without further ado, let’s get rolling!!

I got a chance to try out both the Beats Solo 3 and Studio Wireless 2.0, and I have to say I wasn’t all that impressed with the Studio version. I honestly don’t understand how these headphones can be priced so high. What you’re getting ultimately is a bass heavy sound. That’s fine, if the bass were actually any good. It definitely has volume, but it’s loose and reckless. There’s no solidarity. Imagine Mr. Pink in Reservoir Dogs referring to these in an angry, annoyed tone: “What we need here is a little SOLIDARITY!!”

Lol. I mean don’t get me wrong; it’s not like nails on a chalkboard or anything, but you can definitely tell that they aren’t as balanced as they need to be, and the treble can sound artificial at times, even sibilant. It’s a very peaky sound. What does Sibilant mean?

I fully believe that you can have a bass heavy sound, but that doesn’t mean it has to come through like low grade dog food. Haha.

I suppose on it’s own, the Studio Wireless doesn’t sound bad. But next to the Solo? Different story. That said, I actually did enjoy the Solo version of this headphone line. Let’s get into why!

Similarities

• They both have that glossy finish.
• They are both Bluetooth, and have the Play/Pause button on the side with the “b” logo.
• Both are pretty comfortable overall.
• Both are Wireless, but also come with a cable in case you want to plug them into something.
• Both sport a higher quality protein leather. I really do appreciate this seemingly small and insignificant feature. I don’t think these will peel off and/or crack like the material on the Sony MDR V6’s or 7506’s. The cups on the Beats are very soft and plush, giving me a real sense of satisfaction.
• Both have that simple and elegant headband folding mechanism, which seems very sturdy. I never feel like I’m going to break them.
• Both are pretty utilitarian in appearance, which is actually hilarious considering that Beats set the trend of making flamboyant looking headphones when they first came out. Now that everyone else is copying them, they go and make a headphone as simple in looks as the Solo. It’s the classic bait and switch method. Brilliant. Tyll from Innerfidelity brought this to my attention in one of his articles, so I’m giving credit to him.
• Both are closed back headphones. Closed back vs. Open back headphones.
• I think both have a tendency at times to become a bit sibilant in the treble area. It’s nothing too earth shattering, but do keep it in mind.

Differences

• Size. The Studio Wireless are a little bigger and definitely bulkier than the Solo’s. I feel much more comfortable with the Solo’s as a portable headphone than I do with the Studio’s, although both are very on the go friendly.
• Ear-cups. The Solo’s have smaller ear-cups, and they rest On your ear (Supra-aural). The Studio Wireless sport bigger cups, and they go around your ear (Circum-aural).
• Noise Cancelling. Both have good sound isolation, but the Solo’s do not have a noise cancelling feature while the Studio’s do.
• Comfort. I would say that the Solo’s are more comfortable, but that’s initially. Because the Studio’s rest around your ear, over time they are more comfortable. I did find myself adjusting the Solo’s after about an hour or two. It was a slight annoyance but still noteworthy.
• Overall sound. Everything is much looser and artificial sounding on the Studio Wireless. Sound is sort of given “free reign” if you will. The bass rumbles much more, but not really in a good way. It also starts to distort at higher volumes, whereas the Solo’s do pretty well in standing their ground. The treble is a bit grating, and there isn’t too much of a mid-range to speak of. With the Solo version, you get the opposite. I was astonished at how different they are. The Solo’s have a much tighter bass. It sounds punchier but less in your face. It’s definitely there though. I would consider these the quintessential consumer bass head’s headphones; they sound exciting, and the sound is much more balanced as a whole. The Solo’s are crisper and tighter, while the Studio’s are much fuzzier.
• The Solo3 W1 Chip. The Solo3 offers the W1 chip which dramatically increases battery life + easy pairing with Apple Devices. I have an Android, and the pairing was relatively simple, although it did take a couple of times for the Solo’s to be recognized. The Solo3 also gets a nice 40 hours of battery life, while the Studio Wireless only gets 12.

Beats Studio 3 Vs Solo 3

I would definitely steer clear of the Studio Wireless if I were you. They sound pretty bad in comparison to the Solo3’s. The sound is chunky, loose, and flabby. Imagine a dude with 25% body fat and little muscle mass. Now imagine that same dude at 10%. He’s tight, lean, but still has some muscle on him. He not only appears better and more healthy looking, but he is more healthy. He’s also stronger and more balanced as a man. This is how I can best make an analogy between the two headphones in question today.

As for the question of: Are the Solo3’s worth the price? I would say they are if you specifically need a Bluetooth Wireless headphone that has a fantastic, consumer oriented sound, great durability, much improved comfort over it’s predecessors, and the option of using it wired as well! The Studio Wireless are definitely overpriced and not worth it at all, but the Solo’s are. They really took me by surprise when I tried them out, and I would recommend them for sure.

Studio Or Solo Beats

If you’re looking for more of a true audiophile type headphone with a monumental bass slam, look no further than the V-Moda Crossfade M100. It’s truly a bass-heads delight, with a low end that is controlled, but never lacks impact. Not only that, but it’s comfortable, durable, and has an incredibly detailed and articulate sound signature for a closed back model. Interested in learning all about it?

Well that’s about it for today my friend! I hope you’ve enjoyed this Beats Solo 3 vs. Studio comparison.

Beats Studio 3 Wireless Headphones

Questions? Comments? Requests? Did I miss the mark on something? Looking for something else? Please let me know down below or Contact me!!

All the best and God bless,

-Stu